Scientific Research


Uniformity when researching a phenomena involves what some might consider as consistency throughout the variables. Academia agents posits rigorous standards for scientific researchers in the ability to weigh variables of quantitative studies (Christensen, Burke Johnson, & Turner, 2014). It is in this light some skeptics of qualitative research argue its validity, and call the practice speculative at best. Continual discussion of scientific research criteria sheds light for consistency in results to avoid conjecture and bias errors. Consistent studies provides baselines for all variables. Some experiments help create a natural condition to observe the phenomena in. Creating a phenomena outside its discovered habitat such as growing a plant indoors oppose to outside. In the scenario above one student discussed three common variables in plant growth being dirt, sun, and water. Discovering hidden variables can be extremely difficult to the point of impossible. Through research we have discovered massive details surrounding phenomena but there is much more to learn (Christensen, Burke Johnson, & Turner, 2014). For the things that we discover through quantitative research are experimental and provides growth to the body of knowledge. In the plant discussion the variables were dirt, sunlight, and water. Meanwhile the three variables are phenomenal in themselves and can lead to additional studies. Reference Christensen, L.B., Burke Johnson, R., & Tuner, L.A. (2014). Research methods, design, and analysis (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Authority reasoning